PEMBELAJARAN MENULIS ESAI DALAM DISERTASI: KAJIAN METAKOGNITIF

  • Teguh Budiharso Unmul
Abstract views: 299 , PDF downloads: 145
Keywords: writing aspect, metacognitive, assessment, experiment.

Abstract

 

 

Four dissertations on writing subject are analyzed in this study implementing metacognitive analyses.  The analysis focused on the overall aspects of how research procedures are employed and how the findings of those dissertations are modified for the purpose of a new research on similar concerns.  The study reveals that prospective research topics in writing are available.  Both approaches and topics of writing are offered from which research designs vary.  Quantitative approaches using experimental study may be focused on the testing of teaching methods in writing, writing strategies, the writing process, and techniques of writing.  Rhetoric and linguistics aspects of writing are topics from which researchers can develop with various objectives.  Specifically, assessment on writing is a prospective field that is recently required in relation to the performance assessment. In addition, developing teaching materials on the writing of which Research and Development (R&D) design is applicable is also demanding.

 

 

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Ary, D. Jacobs, L.C. and Razavieh, A. 1985. Introduction to Research in Education. New York: Rinehart and Winston Inc.

Berg, B.L. 1989. Qualitative Research Methods for the Social Sciences. London:

Allyn and Bacon, Co.

Bogdan, R and Sari K.B. 1992. Qualitative Research for Education. Needham

Heights: A Division of Simon & Schuster Inc.

Brown, G. and Yule, G. 1981. Discourse Analysis. Cambridge: Cambridge

University Press.

Budiharso, T. 2008. Contrastive Analysis on Rhetoric and Linguistic Features of

Academic Essays. Yogyakarta: Penerbit Cawanmas.

Budiharso, T. 2006a. The Rhetoric Features of English and Indonesian Essays

Made by EFL Undergraduate Students. TEFLIN Journal, 17(2):54-86.

Budiharso, T. 2006b. The Linguistic Features of English and Indonesian Essays

Made by EFL Undergraduate Students. Bahasa dan Seni, Jurnal Bahasa, sastra, dan Pengajarannya, 34(1):1-18.

Budiharso, T. 2006c. Rhetoric and Linguistic Features: A Contrastive Rhetoric

Analysis of Essay Writing. Yogyakarta: Steppapublishing.

Budiharso, T. 2001. Rhetoric and the Linguistic Features of English and

Indonesian Essays by EFL Undergraduate Students. Unpublished Doctoraal Dissertation. Malang: State University of Malang.

Carson, J.E, Carrell, P.L. Silberstein, S., Kroll, B, and Kuehn, P.A. 1990. Reading-

Writing Relationships in First and Second Language. TESOL QUARTERLY, 24(2):245-266.

Caudery, T. 1995. The Process Approach: Seminar Notes. Paper Presented in

the British Council Summer School on Writing in the Classroom. Guildford: University of Surrey.

Connor, U. 1996. Contrastive Rhetoric: Cross-Cultural Aspects of Second

Language Writing. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Connor, U and J. Lauer. 1988. Cross-Cultural Variation in Persuasive Student

Writing. In Writing Across Languages and Cultures. pp. 138-159. Newbury Park, CA: Sage Publication.

Fraenkel, J.R., and Wallen N.E. 1990. How to Design and Evaluate Research in

Education. New York: McGraw-Hill Inc.

Harjanto, I. 1991. The Effect of Sentence Combining Practice on Students

Writing Ability in Terms of Language Use. Unpublished Master’s Thesis. Malang: IKIP MALANG.

Harjanto, I. 1999. English Academic Writing Features by Indonesian Learners of

English. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. Malang: IKIP MALANG.

Hartfiel, V.F., Hughey, J.B., Wormuth, D.R. Jacobs, H.L. 1985. Learning ESL

Composition: English Composition Program. London: Newbury House Publishers, Inc.

Holsti, O.R. 1969. Content Analysis for Social Sciences and Humanities. Donn

Mills, Ontario: Addison-Wesley Publishing.

Kaplan, R.B. 1980. Cultural Thought Patterns in Intercultural Education. In Croft

(ed.) 1980. Readings on English as a Second Language for Teachers and Teacher Trainees. Boston: Little Brown and Co. pp. 399-418.

Krashen, S.D. 1981. Writing: Research, Theory, and Applications. Oxford:

Pergamon Institute of English.

Krippendorff, K. 1980. Content Analysis: An Introduction to Its Methodology.

London: Sage Publications.

Langan, J. 1986. College Writing Skills with Readings. London: McGraw-Hill

Company.

Latief, M.A. 1990. Assessment of English Writing Skills for Students of English as

a Second Language at IKIP MALANG Indonesia. Unpublished Ph.D. Dissertation. Iowa City, Iowa: The University of Iowa.

Miles M and M. Huberman. 1994. Qualitative Data Analysis: An Expanded

Sourcesbook. Beverly Hills: SAGE Publication Inc.

Mukminatien, N. 1997. The Differences of Students’ Writing Achievement Across

Different Course Levels. Unpublished Doctoral Dissertation. Malang: IKIP MALANG.

Newman, I and Benz, C.R. 1998. Qualitative-Quantitative Research Methodology:

Exploring the Interactive Continuum. Austin, Texas: Southern Illinois University Press.

Oshima, A. and Houge, A. 1991. Writing Academic English: A Writing and

Sentence Structure Handbook. Second Edition. Cambridge: Addison-Wesley Publishing Company.

Solikhah, Imroatus. 2016. Refleksi dan Implikasi Penelitian Disertasi Doktor dan

Menulis untuk Jurnal Internasional. Cendekia, 10(2):255-268.

Wahab, A. 1995. Indonesian Rhetoric in Intercultural Communication. The

TEFLIN Silver Anniversary Seminar. Yogyakarta: IKIP Yogyakarta, Gajah Mada University, Sanata Dharma University, August, 2-5.

Published
2018-10-05
How to Cite
Budiharso, T. (2018). PEMBELAJARAN MENULIS ESAI DALAM DISERTASI: KAJIAN METAKOGNITIF. Cendekia: Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran, 12(2), 141-152. https://doi.org/10.30957/cendekia.v12i2.535